lichess.org
Donate

I will research this subject more better.

Well, it seems my arguments seems irrelevant to people (about ratings between 2800 and 2000). I will not argue yet. I will research this all better in my free time. I will talk with people, who understand how rating-system works, will talk with good chess theorists. And might be I will find better proofs, might be I will find out that I'm wrong. I don't know how much time will it take. Maybe years.
So. If I will find out that I am wrong, I will here, in public, say that yes, I was wrong and you all were right. And I'm not worthy to argue anymore. I will say, that you all are much more clever than me.
But. If it will turn out that I'm actually right (that is also possible), something will happen. I don't say what. I don't say when.
But, I promise. :)
I don't think moderators closing your redundant topics is an invitation to start yet another thread on said topic.
fine, lets discuss it

i completely disagree with your arguments, they lack philsophical grounding. I quote chapter 2 of aristotles' democracy
Fine. Here is the link to the discussion. We can discuss it as much as we need in my team. So, nobody will close this topic.
http://en.lichess.org/forum/team-30-seconds--0-time-control/discussion-of-rating-attributes
Give your arguments.
All people can participate in it.
The main issues are:
1. Can one boost his rating, playing with lower rated players.
2. In particular, the situation about Singer__Marta.

Here are links to previous discussions:
http://en.lichess.org/forum/general-chess-discussion/why-am-i-not-in-the-rankings-in-the-bullet
http://en.lichess.org/forum/off-topic-discussion/is-playing-with-lower-rated-players-considered-boosting

This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.